MS NO.: PJMDS/OA/006/2024

Original Article

Submitted: May 27, 2024

Revised: June 16, 2024

Accepted: August 16, 2024

 

Prevalence of Hyperuricemia in Smoker Population with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus

Sooraj Kumar1, Lata2, Toseef Altaf Memon3, Naveed4

Corresponding Author

Sooraj Kumar1

Email: [email protected]

Affiliations:

Liaquat University of Medical and Health Sciences (LUMHS),

Jamshoro1,2,3

Indus Hospital Karachi4

Postgraduate Resident1,2,4

Doctor of Medicine (MD)3

 

 

ABSTRACT

Objective: To determine the prevalence of hyperuricemia in smoker population with type 2 diabetes mellitus.

 

Methodology: This descriptive cross-sectional study was carried out in the Department of Medicine, Liaquat University of Medical and Health Sciences (LUMHS), Jamshoro, from June to December 2021. The study was conducted involving smoking populated individuals diagnosed with type 2 diabetes mellitus. The diagnosed cases who fulfilled the inclusion criteria were included in the study. The participants' blood samples were taken to assess the uric acid to confirm hyperuricemia. The data was analyzed in SPSS version 26.0.

 

Results: In this study, a total of 576 diabetic patients diagnosed with type II were enrolled. The mean age was 51.31±13.76 an age range of 18 and 85 years. Males were dominant i.e. 66.7% v/s 33.3% females. Hyperuricemia was prevalent in 28.125% of patients.

 

Conclusion: It is to be concluded that hyperuricemia is prevalent in type II diabetic smoker patients. Since the study was conducted on a limited sample size from a single hospital, the findings may not accurately represent the situation across the entire country, and in order to generalise the results of our research, it must be assessed further in a broader sample of patients at other hospitals throughout the nation.

 

Keywords: Hyperuricemia, Prevalence, Smokers, Type II diabetes mellitus

 

INTRODUCTION

Diabetes is causing a sharp rise in morbidity and mortality in Pakistan; its prevalence has reached 17.1%1. Type II diabetes mellitus has been found to have a substantial correlation with both blood uric acid levels and smokers2. Insulin resistance is closely linked to metabolic syndrome (MS) and diabetes mellitus. The main components of metabolic syndrome are hypertension, hyperglycemia, hyperinsulinemia, and hyperlipidemia3. This has been shown to have independent risk factors, to be a lethal component of coronary heart disease (CHD), and to synergistically accelerate type II diabetes mellitus and non-diabetic atherscoleropathy as well as MS- related atherscoleropathy3,4. Similarly, a study5 found that four parameters—highly sensitive C-reactive protein, reactive oxygen species, hyperuricemia, and hyperhomocysteinemia

are critical to the development of syndrome expansion.

 

Therefore, as a recommended screening strategy for type II diabetes mellitus, the population's greater risk of atherosclerosis needs to be determined6. Levels of serum uric acid and risk factors of cardiovascular disease have been shown to be strongly correlated7. Globally, there is rise in

diabetes mellitus type II and its increasing comorbidities, which greatly raises morbidity and death rates8. Hyperuricemia is the state in which one's serum uric acid level is unusually increased. Purine metabolism and breakdown under normal metabolic circumstances produce uric acid as a byproduct9. Purine metabolism involves two final processes, which are catalyzed by xanthine oxidoreductase. First, xanthine is converted from hypoxanthine to uric acid10. Urate, the monoanion of uric acid, is eliminated by urination and is thought to have minimal physiological significance at physiological pH levels11. But purine metabolism can be disturbed for a variety of

reasons, some of which may be hereditary and others of which may be acquired, leading to an aberrant elevation in blood uric acid level (hyperuricemia) 12. There is a hypothesis that links the

risk of type 2 diabetes to the amount of serum uric acid (SUA). Uric acid (UA) reduces the availability of nitric oxide, which is essential for insulin-stimulated glucose absorption. This reduction in availability leads to the physiologic worsening of insulin resistance in animal models13.

 

Moreover, there has been little research on the occurrence of hyperuricemia and its related variables in emerging nations, particularly in Asian areas. As far as we know, there have been just a few research conducted on this subject in Pakistan. Hence, the objective of this research was to ascertain the frequency of hyperuricemia among individuals who smoke and have type 2 diabetes mellitus. The study's results are expected to provide valuable insights for both physicians and researchers. Moreover, they may be beneficial for implementing strategies to mitigate metabolic problems linked to hyperuricemia.

 

METHODOLOGY

This descriptive cross-sectional study was conducted at the Department of Medicine at Liaquat University of Medical and Health Science (LUMHS) Jamshoro, from June 2021 to December 2021. A total of 576 participants were recruited using a non-probability consecutive sampling method. The study included patients of either gender, aged 20 to 70 years, who had been diagnosed with type II diabetes mellitus for more than 5 years. Participants who were smokers and presented with complaints related to type II diabetes mellitus were included in the study.

 

Exclusion criteria comprised individuals with major comorbidities, recent urological surgeries, immunodeficiency, or a history of alcohol consumption. Additionally, individuals with a history of chronic liver diseases, chronic renal failure, histologically diagnosed malignancies, cardiovascular diseases, or hypertension were also excluded from the study.

 

Approval for the study was granted by the institutional ethical review committee. All participants provided written informed consent, and confidentiality was maintained throughout the study. Demographic data were collected using a preset proforma after obtaining informed consent. Sociodemographic information such as age, sex, family history of diabetes mellitus, duration of diabetes, and smoking history was gathered. A physical examination was conducted, and quantitative characteristics, including weight, height, waist-tohip ratio (WHR), and body mass index (BMI), were recorded. Clinical measurements such as systolic blood pressure, diastolic blood pressure, and heart rate were also documented.

 

A 10 ml blood sample was collected from each participant for laboratory analysis. Postprandial blood sugar levels were estimated using the glucosoxidase-peroxidase method. Lipid profiles and blood urea levels were determined using the diacetyl monoxime method, while serum creatinine levels were measured using the alkaline picrate methodology.

 

Continuous data were reported as the number of cases with corresponding percentages and were compared using the Chi-square test. The Chi-square test was also used to compare categorical variables, with significance set at a p-value of less than 0.05. Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS version 26.0.

 

RESULTS

Table I presents the demographic characteristics of type II diabetes smoker patients (n=576). Most of the patients were male (66.7%), having a mean age of 51.31 ± 13.76 years. Age distribution showed that 50.5% were between 18-50 years, and 49.5% were above 60 years old. BMI mean was 30.99 ± 5.20 kg/m2, with 9.2% categorized as normal, 38.0% as overweight, and 52.8% as obese. Mean DM duration was 6.53 ± 6.18 years, 58.9% having diabetes for 0-5 years and 41.1% for more than 5 years. Distribution of marital status was 29.2% were unmarried, 61.8% married and 9.0% separated, widowed, or divorced. Educational status distribution included 33.5% with primary education, 53.3% with secondary education, and 13.2% with higher education. In terms of residential status, 76.0% lived in urban areas, while 24.0% resided in rural areas. Occupational status indicated that 73.1% were employed, and 26.9% were unemployed.

 

Table II outlines the clinical characteristics of Type II diabetes smoker patients with or without hyperuricemia (n=576). The comparison with hyperuricemia revealed no significant differences in fasting blood glucose (p=0.637), random blood glucose (p=0.988), total cholesterol (p=0.229), triglyceride levels (p=0.997), HDL (p=0.114), LDL (p=0.482), SBP (p=0.871), and DBP (p=0.355). However, a significant difference was noted in uric acid levels, with those with hyperuricemia having a higher mean of 8.85 ± 0.66 compared to 6.03 ± 1.07 in the non-hyperuricemia group (p=0.000).

 

Table III presents factors associated with or without hyperuricemia among Type II diabetes smoker patients (n=576). The analysis includes age group, gender, BMI, hypertension, dyslipidemia, smoking status, waist circumference, total cholesterol, triglyceride, family history of hyperuricemia, HDL, and LDL. Among these factors, the odds ratios (OR) with 95% confidence intervals (C.I.) and p-values are provided. Notable findings include a significant association between hyperuricemia and smoking status (OR=1.6, p=0.672). Additionally, there is a trend toward association with hypertension (OR=1.42, p=0.058) and HDL levels (OR=1.88, p=0.132). No other variables showed significant correlations with hyperuricemia.

 

 

Table I: Profile of Type II Diabetic Smokers (n=576)

Demographic Profile

Frequency %

Gender

Male

384 (66.7)

Female

192 (33.3)

Age, Mean ± SD= 51.31 ± 13.76 Years

18-50 Years

291 (50.5)

>60 Years

285 (49.5)

Body Mass Index, Mean ± SD= 30.99 ± 5.20 kg/m2

Normal

53 (9.2)

Overweight

219 (38.0)

Obese

304 (52.8)

Duration of Diabetes, Mean ± SD= 6.53 ± 6.18 Years

0-5 Years

339 (58.9)

>5 Years

237 (41.1)

Marital Status

Unmarried

168 (29.2)

Married

356 (61.8)

Separated/Widowed/Divorced

52 (9.0)

Educational Status

Primary

193 (33.5)

Secondary

307 (53.3)

Higher

76 (13.2)

Residential Status

 

Urban

438 (76.0)

Rural

138 (24.0)

Occupational Status

Employed

421 (73.1)

Unemployed

155 (26.9)

 

 

Table II: Clinical Characteristics of Type II Diabetes Smoker Patients with or without Hyperuricemia (n=576)

Clinical & Biochemical Parameters

Hyperuricemia

P-Value

 

Yes

(n=162)

No

(n=414)

Fasting Blood Glucose 

128.91 ± 24.75

129.96 ± 23.52

0.637

Random Blood Glucose 

162.95 ± 55.49

163.02 ± 51.65

0.988

Total Cholesterol

175.81 ± 42.80

180.70 ± 44.10

0229

Triglyceride

185.45 ± 136.25

185.40 ± 141.31

0.997

High-Density Lipoprotein (HDL)

44.54 ± 14.34

42.55 ± 13.30

0.114

Low-Density Lipoprotein (LDL)

110.63 ± 38.30

113.26 ± 41.19

0.482

Systolic Blood Pressure (SBP)

136.07 ± 17.63

135.80 ± 18.12

0.871

Diastolic Blood Pressure (DBP)

84.46 ± 9.61

83.51 ± 11.57

0.355

Uric Acid

8.85 ± 0.66

6.03 ± 1.07

0.000

 

 

Table III: Factors Associated with Hyperuricemia in Type II Diabetes Smokers (n=576)

Factors

Hyperuricemia

Odd Ratio (95% C.I.)

P-Value

 

Yes

(n=162)

No

(n=414)

 

Age Group

18 – 50 Years 

74 (25.4%)

217 (74.6%)

1.31 (0.91 ---- 1.88)

0.146

 

>50 Years

88 (30.9%)

197 (69.1%)

0.76 (0.53 ---- 1.09)

Gender

Male

104 (27.1%)

280 (72.9%)

1.16 (0.796 ---- 1.70)

0.432

 

Female

58 (30.2%)

134 (69.8%)

0.85 (0.58 ---- 1.25)

Body Mass Index

Normal 

11 (20.8%)

42 (79.2%)

0.75 (0.37 ---- 1.54)

0.071

 

Overweight

73 (33.3%)

146 (66.7%)

1.90 (0.92 ---- 3.92)

 

Obese

78 (25.7%)

226 (74.3%)

1.31 (0.64 ---- 2.68)

Hypertension

Yes

79 (24.9%)

238 (75.1%)

1.42 (0.98 ---- 2.04)

0.058

 

No

83 (32.0%)

176 (058%)

0.70 (0.48 ---- 1.01)

Dyslipidemia

Yes

31 (28.2%)

79 (71.8%)

0.99 (0.62 ---- 1.58)

0.988

 

No

131 (28.1%)

335 (71.9%)

1.00 (0.63 ---- 1.59)

Smoking Status

Yes

33 (26.6%)

91 (73.4%)

1.6 (12.32 ---- 12.33)

0.672

 

No

129 (28.5%)

323 (71.5%)

1.6 (12.32 ---- 12.33)

Waist Circumference

Yes

35 (31.5%)

76 (68.5%)

0.81 (0.52 ---- 1.27)

0.374

 

No

127 (27.3%)

338 (72.7%)

1.22 (0.78 ---- 1.92)

Total Cholesterol

Normal

115 (27.8%)

298 (72.2%)

1.05 (0.70 ---- 1.56)

0.812

 

High

47 (28.8%)

116 (71.2%)

0.95 (0.63 ---- 1.42)

Triglyceride

Normal

76 (28.1%)

194 (71.9%)

0.99 (0.69 ---- 1.43)

0.991

 

High

86 (28.1%)

220 (71.9%)

1.00 (0.69 ---- 1.44)

Family History of Hyperuricemia

Yes

10 (22.7%)

34 (77.3%)

1.36 (0.65 ---- 2.82)

0.407

 

No

152 (28.6%)

380 (71.4%)

0.73 (0.35 ---- 1.52)

High-Density

Lipoprotein (HDL)

Yes

152 (27.5%)

400(72.5%)

1.88 (0.81 ---- 4.32)

0.132

 

No

10 (41.7%)

14 (58.3%)

0.53 (0.23 ---- 1.22)

Low-Density

Lipoprotein (LDL)

Yes

111 (28.5%)

279 (71.5%)

0.95 (0.64 ---- 1.40)

0.795

 

No

51 (27.4%)

135 (72.6%)

1.05 (0.71 ---- 1.55)

 

 

DISCUSSION

Diabetes mellitus (DM), also known as "sugar", is a chronic noncommunicable disease (NCD) that has emerged as a major global health concern. The condition is attributed to pancreatic insufficiency in insulin production, leading to elevated blood sugar levels known as hyperglycemia. Type 2 diabetes mellitus is associated with insulin resistance and inadequate

compensatory insulin secretion14.

Both young and elderly suffer from type 2 diabetes, which is closely linked to high rates of morbidity and death as well as significant medical expenses for affected individuals, their families, and nations15.

According to the International Diabetes Federation (IDF), there are 352 million persons worldwide who have impaired glucose tolerance, which raises their chances of developing diabetes by 2045. The burden of diabetes is rising, but there is a lack of

epidemiological data and inadequate therapies16.

The incidence of hyperuricemia has been increasing quickly in recent years among people worldwide15. Recent data indicates that hyperuricemia is becoming more common not only in

wealthy nations, but also frequently occurring in low- and middle-income nations. Obesity, a diet high in purines, and alcohol intake have all been shown as separate risk factors for the development of hyperuricemia17.

Hyperuricemia is very common in people with metabolic syndrome and has been linked to incident insulin resistance. Hyperuricemia is well recognised as a causative factor in the progression of diabetes, hypertension, atherosclerosis, cardiovascular disease, and chronic renal disease. 

As per our study findings, hyperuricemia was prevalent in 28.125% of patients. Several investigations were undertaken to determine the frequency of hyperuricemia in individuals with

type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). The proportion of hyperuricemia between the cases of diabetes was 12.13% in Pakistan14, the incidence of Chinese cases was 32.6% with Type II diabetes mellitus15, prevalence rates of 33.6% and 25.3% have been seen in Indian individuals16,17, Ethiopian cases 33.8% 18, and Nigerian cases 25.3%19. In terms of clinical practice, clinicians are becoming increasingly concerned about the prevalence of hyperuricemia with metabolic syndrome (MS). Moreover, hyperuricemia may not show symptoms until much later and may only be discovered in conjunction with other problems like uremia20.

Most people agree that smoking cigarettes increases the chance of developing several well-known chronic illnesses including diabetes, cardiovascular disease, and cancer. Additionally, some chronic musculoskeletal conditions such degenerative disc disease, rheumatoid arthritis, and low back pain are thought to be linked to it. 

Hyperuricemia has lately gained attention due to research indicating its association with cardiovascular risk factors and its considerable contribution to the development of metabolic diseases.

The non-probability consecutive sampling limits the generalizability of the findings to the broader diabetic smoker population. The cross-sectional design prevents causal inferences between hyperuricemia and type 2 diabetes in smokers. Potential reporting biases may affect data accuracy, and the single-center setting restricts the applicability of the results to other populations or settings. Additionally, the sample may not fully represent the broader diabetic population with complex health conditions.

 

CONCLUSION

It is to be concluded that hyperuricemia is prevalent in type II diabetic smoker patients. Since the study was conducted on a limited sample size from a single hospital, the findings may not

accurately represent the situation across the entire country, and in order to generalize the results of our research, it must be assessed further in a broader sample of patients at other hospitals throughout the nation.

 

Conflict of Interest: Authors declare there is no conflict of interest.

Source of Fundings: Nil

Authors' Contributions: Kumar S: Led the study and was responsible for its overall design. Lata; Managed study logistics and assisted in data collection. Memon T: Handled data analysis and interpretation of results. Naveed: Conducted the literature review, contributed to manuscript writing, and provided a critical review. Each author played a crucial role in the successful completion of the research.

 

 

REFERENCES

  1. Rowley WR, Bezold C, Arikan Y, Byrne E, Krohe S. Diabetes 2030: insights from yesterday, today, and future trends. Popul Health Manag 2017;20:6-12.

 

  1. Waldfogel JM, Nesbit SA, Dy SM, Sharma R, Zhang A, Wilson LM, et al. Pharmacotherapy for diabetic peripheral neuropathy pain and quality of life: a systematic review. Neurology 2017;88:1958-67.

 

  1. Pop-Busui R, Boulton AJ, Feldman EL, Bril V, Freeman R, Malik RA, et al. Diabetic neuropathy: a position statement by the American Diabetes Association. Diabetes Care 2017;40:136-54.             

 

  1. Barrett EJ, Liu Z, Khamaisi M, King GL, Klein R, Klein BEK, et al. Diabetic microvascular disease: an endocrine society scientific statement. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2017;102: 4343-410.

 

  1. Feldman EL, Nave KA, Jensen TS, Bennett DLH. New horizons in diabetic neuropathy: mechanisms, bioenergetics, and pain. Neuron 2017;93:1296-313.

 

  1. Zenkov NK, Chehushkov AV, Kozhin PM, Martinovich GG, Kandalintseva NV, Menshchikova EB. Autophagy as a protective mechanism in oxidative stress. Bulletin Sib Med. 2019;18(2):195-214.

 

  1. Kanbay M, Girerd N, Machu JL, Bozec E, Duarte K, Boivin JM, et al. Impact of uric acid on hypertension occurrence and target organ damage: insights from the STANISLAS cohort with a 20-year follow-up. Am J Hypertens. 2020;33(9):869-78.

 

  1. Somuncu MU, Serbest NG, Akgül F, Çakır MO, Akgün T, Tatar FP, et al. The relationship between a combination of vitamin D deficiency and hyperuricemia and the severity of coronary artery disease in myocardial infarction patients. Turk Kardiyol Dern Ars. 2020;48 (1):10-14.

 

  1. Pallavi M, Nithindran GS, Ranjithvishal RV, Laavanyaa NS, Bhat C, Banerjee P, et al. Influence of uric acid on erythrocytes subjected to H2O2-induced oxidative stress. Applied In Vitro Toxicol. 2023;9(2):37-43.

 

  1. Molla MD, Bekele A, Melka DS, Teklemariam MD, Challa F, Ayelign B, e tal. Hyperuricemia and its associated factors among adult staff members of the Ethiopian Public Health Institute, Ethiopia. Int J Gen Med. 2021:1437-47.

 

  1. Pathmanathan K, Robinson PC, Hill CL, Keen HI. The prevalence of gout and hyperuricaemia in Australia: An updated systematic review. Semin Arthritis Rheum. 2021; 51(1):121-8.

 

  1. Mazza A, Lenti S, Schiavon L, et al. Asymptomatic hyperuricemia is a strong risk factor for resistant hypertension in elderly subjects from general population. Biomed Pharmacother. 2017;86:590–4. 

 

  1. Robinson PC. Gout - An update of aetiology, genetics, co-morbidities and management. Maturitas. 2018;118:67–73.

 

  1. Samin KA, Ullah K, Shah MI, Ansari A, Khalil S, Saeed M. A study on serum uric acid level in type II diabetes mellitus. PJMHS. 2021; 15(7):2317.

 

  1. Wang J, Chen RP, Lei L, et al. Prevalence and determinants of hyperuricemia in type 2 diabetes mellitus patients with central obesity in Guangdong Province in China. Asia Pac J Clin Nutr. 2013;22:590–8.

 

  1. Billa G, Dargad R, Mehta A. Prevalence of hyperuricemia in Indian subjects attending hyperuricemia screening programs-a retrospective study. J Assoc Physicians India. 2018; 66:43–6.

 

  1. Mundhe S, Mhasde D. The study of prevalence of hyperuricemia and metabolic syndrome in type 2 diabetes mellitus. Int J Adv Med. 2016;3:241–9.

 

  1. Woyesa SB, Hirigo AT, Wube TB. Hyperuricemia and metabolic syndrome in type 2 diabetes mellitus patients at Hawassa university comprehensive specialized hospital, South West Ethiopia. BMC Endocr Disord. 2017;17:76. 

 

  1. Ogbera AO, Azenabor AO. Hyperuricaemia and the metabolic syndrome in type 2 DM. Diabetol Metab Syndr. 2010;2:24.

 

  1. He H, Guo P, He J, Zhang J, Niu Y, Chen S, et al. Prevalence of hyperuricemia and the population attributable fraction of modifiable risk factors: evidence from a general population cohort in China. Front Public Health. 2022;10:936717.

 


How to cite: Kumar S, Lata, Memon TA, Naveed. Prevalence of Hyperuricemia in Smoker Population with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus. Pak J Med Dent Sci. 2024;1(1):12-16